Grundstein v. Vt. Bd. of Bar Examiners
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
18‐180 Grundstein v. Vt. Bd. of Bar Examiners UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION ASUMMARY ORDER@). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Calderon v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Leon v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- R. E. Bean Construction Co. v. Middlebury Associates & Middlebury Developers, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1980
- In Re MonaghanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1966
- Edward C. KING, Appellant, v. Lawrence A. FOX, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.