Legal Opinion

Rudersdorf v. Bowers

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 22, 1937No. 10460PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CODY, Justice.

This is a will contest. At this time the sole ground urged for setting aside the probate of the will is that the testator was without testamentary capacity. Only two assignments of error are urged: First, that the court erroneously instructed a verdict in favor of proponents; second, that’ the court erroneously sustained proponents’ objection to the hypothetical question of contestants to their witness Dr. Stafford. Contestants are here plaintiffs in error, and proponents are defendants in error.

The testator, Earnest Seaburn, was a bachelor, 78 years old at the time of his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Prather v. McClellandTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Cockrill v. CoxTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Craycroft v. CrawfordTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  4. Vance v. UpsonTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Navarro v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Nass v. NassCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  2. Green v. DicksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  3. Hamill v. BrashearCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Cole v. WaiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. Jowers v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API