Graeme v. State
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
An information was filed charging plaintiffs in error (hereinafter called Graeme and Hamilton) with grand larceny. Trial was had, verdict of guilty returned, and judgment entered sentencing each to serve a term of not less than one year a,nd not more than seven years in the state reformatory, to reverse which they respectively prosecute error. While there are many reasons for reversal urged, they may be condensed into two: First, that the judgment as to each is without support in the evidence; second, errors of law occurring at the trial.
As to Graeme: The state in its brief and at the oral…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Palmer v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Kleinschmidt v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
- Dunlap v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by1 opinion
- Scott v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1931