Legal Opinion

Fidelity-Phenix Fire Insurance v. Brennan

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 1, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

The plaintiffs contend that inasmuch as the policies are void as to the owners of the damaged property, the amount of the loss should not be applied either to reduce the mortgage indebtedness or to repair the property, that their position is in reality that of sureties, and that before payment of the loss be required of them, the defendant bank should first exhaust its remaining security under the mortgage.

Each policy conforms to the standard requirements of this state and contains the following provision, frequently called the union mortgage clause: “If this policy shall be made payable to a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hastings v. . Westchester Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Allen v. Watertown Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  3. Bingham v. MearsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. HENSLEY v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  2. Firstbank Shinnston v. West Virginia InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. W. A. Emerson's Sons, Inc. v. CloutmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
  4. Labonté v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
  5. HENSLEY v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API