Legal Opinion

Russell v. The Texas Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 9, 1954No. 14246PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Circuit Judge.

The appellant filed a complaint in the District Court alleging three causes of action. The first cause states that the defendant Northern Pacific Railway Company received patent to a certain section of land pursuant to the terms of the Northern Pacific Land Grant of 1864, 13 Stat. 365; that it subsequently conveyed the land to plaintiff's pi'ede-cessor excepting and reserving the minerals upon or in the land. It alleges that the purported exception and reservation of such minerals is void, but that notwithstanding such invalidity the Railway Company executed an oil and gas…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Steccone v. Morse-Starrett Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  2. Burkhart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  3. J. E. Haddock, Ltd. v. PillsburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  4. Liberty Mut. Ins. v. PillsburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rieser v. Baltimore Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  2. Walter W. Johnson Company v. Reconstruction Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  3. Durling v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  4. Island Service Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Joaquin A. PerezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  5. George Gilbertson v. City of FairbanksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API