Legal Opinion

Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. Amos

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 1898No. 2,257PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Jennings Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

The appellee’s complaint against the appellant was held sufficient on demurrer. The objections urged against the complaint, in argument relative to this ruling, assail the pleading for want of definiteness rather than for failure to state a cause of action. Upon motion it was made ffiore definite in some respects. The motion to require it to be made more definite having been renewed, it was overruled, and this ruling is assigned as error. But in the bill of exceptions by which it was sought to save this matter, the written motion stating wherein it was sought to have the pleading made more…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Colee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Longpre v. Big Blackfoot Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co. v. BurkeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. American Car & Foundry Co. v. NachandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Indiana Natural & Illuminating Gas Co. v. MarshallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Boyce v. SchroederIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API