Legal Opinion

In re Anonymous No. 40 D.B. 88

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 9, 1989No. Disciplinary Board Docket No. 40 D.B. 88Published

1Opinion of the Court

HEH,

Member,

Pursuant to rule 208(d) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement, the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania submits its findings and recommendations to your honorable court with respect to the above petition for discipline.

HISTORY OF PROCEEDINGS

On or about June 15, 1982, the minor son of [ ] and [ ] [A] sustained serious injuries in an automobile accident. The [As] retained Attorney [B] to represent them. Attorney [B] assembled a file, but was unable to continue to represent the [As]. Attorney [B] referred the [As] to respondent. Mrs. [A] gave the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maginnis's CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Krehel AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Matter of RosenbaumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API