In re Anonymous No. 40 D.B. 88
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HEH,
Member,
Pursuant to rule 208(d) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement, the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania submits its findings and recommendations to your honorable court with respect to the above petition for discipline.
HISTORY OF PROCEEDINGS
On or about June 15, 1982, the minor son of [ ] and [ ] [A] sustained serious injuries in an automobile accident. The [As] retained Attorney [B] to represent them. Attorney [B] assembled a file, but was unable to continue to represent the [As]. Attorney [B] referred the [As] to respondent. Mrs. [A] gave the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Maginnis's CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Krehel AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Matter of RosenbaumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978