Legal Opinion

Furniss v. Furniss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 29, 1911No. Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Sophia It. C. Furniss and another, individually and as trustees, etc., and Clementina Furniss, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 15th day of August,-1911, upon the decision of the court, rendered after a trial at the New York Special Term, requiring an accounting and appointing a referee to take and state the account of the trustees.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, P. J.:

This judgment was entered in pursuance of an order of the Special Term overruling demurrers to the complaint and directing an interlocutory judgment requiring the defendants individually and as trustees to account,. and granting to plaintiffs the relief demanded in the complaint. -The defendant trustees appealed from that order, and this court in a decisión entered herein has reversed the order and sustained the demurrers, giving the plaintiffs leave to amend. (Furniss v. Furniss, No. 1, 148 App. Div. 211.) After the entry of that order the interlocutory judgment was entered,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. Manhattan Real Estate & Loan Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  2. People v. Manhattan Real Estate & Loan Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Smith v. BarnumNew York Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Furniss v. FurnissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Apple v. National Automatic Weighing Machine Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1912
  2. Bromberger v. WorthAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1913
  3. Miles v. WeisbeckerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API