Reed v. Philadelphia Life Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 116, April T., 1914, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Allegheny Co., April T., 1913, No. 2,781, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Carson N. Reed v. Philadelphia Life Insurance Company. Assumpsit to recover premiums paid on policy of life insurance. At the trial the court returned a verdict for plaintiff.
1Opinion of the Court
On motion for defendant non obstante veredicto Macearlane, J., filed the following opinion;
Four cases were tried together in which the plaintiffs were John Duster at No. 2,778, Thomas N. Gummert at No. 2,779, Edward H. Kennerdell at No. 2,780, and Carson N. Reed at No. 2,781, April Term, 1913. The facts are identical except in one particular in Reed’s case. Each is to recover a premium paid in advance on December 6, 1909, with an application for a policy of life insurance. On April 7, 1910, the plaintiffs withdrew the applications, claiming that the policies had not been' delivered.
The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Spring Co. v. KnowltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Second National Bank v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Lonzer v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Irvin v. IrvinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Peters v. GrimSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.