Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Hauer v. McMullin

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided July 2, 2015No. Court of Appeals No. 13CA2283Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

JUDGE GABRIEL concurring in part and dissenting in part.

¶ 41 I concur in the portion of the majority's opinion affirming the award of attorney fees to plaintiffs. The majority further concludes, however, that the recorded final plat, the deeds among the parties, and the subdivision agreement established an implied common interest community and an unincorporated homeowners' association. Because I do not believe that this conclusion is supported by either the applicable law or the evidence in this case, I respectfully dissent from that portion of the majority's opinion.

I. Discussion

¶ 42 Under…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Evergreen Highlands Ass'n v. WestSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  2. Kinder Morgan CO2 Co. v. Montezuma County Board of CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Sun Valley Land & Minerals, Inc. v. HawkesIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  4. American National Bank v. Tina Marie Homes, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Hiwan Homeowners Ass'n v. KnottsColorado Court of Appeals · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API