Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Mitchell

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided May 24, 1993No. NMCM 92 1933Published

1Concurrence

Judge REED,

concurring in the result:

I concur with the result of the majority opinion affirming the findings and sentence, as approved on review below. Additionally, I do not believe that any due process rights of this appellant have been violated. However, I write separately to express my own views on the issue raised by appellant concerning the fitness reports written on the judges of this Court. I believe appellant has raised an allegation that this Court is subjected to a form of command influence and that this allegation should be addressed. I discuss the Judge Advocate General’s (JAG)…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. County of Riverside v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Chandler v. Judicial Council of the Tenth CircuitSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Certain Complaints Under Investigation by an Investigating Committee of Judicial Council of Eleventh Circuit. v. MercerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. KnudsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  5. United States v. LedbetterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API