Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Thompson v. the State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 10, 2015No. A14A2161Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBarnes, Presiding Judge

Because the store shoplifting report relied upon by the prosecution was prepared in anticipation of litigation, the trial court erred in admitting it under the business record exception to hearsay. And admission of the shoplifting report harmed Thompson because it provided the only evidence of the value of the items stolen from the store to support his felony shoplifting conviction. We therefore should *217reverse Thompson’s conviction for felony shoplifting. Because the majority concludes otherwise, I respectfully dissent to Division 1 of the majority opinion.9

Under Georgia’s new Evidence Code,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Echo Acceptance Corp. v. Household Retail Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. Alvenis Arias-IzquierdoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  4. Williams v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  5. Stewart v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API