Legal Opinion

Kaler v. Webster

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 8, 1975PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POMEROY, Justice.

A charge to a jury permitting it to consider as an element of damages the future loss of earning capacity of a twenty-three year old college student occasions this appeal.

We deny the appeal.

Appellee was involved in a traffic accident in August of 1969. He was a passenger in a vehicle operated by appellant, Daniel Webster, at the time the vehicle collided with a truck driven by appellant, Ronald Bean. Appellee sustained an ankle injury in the crash, which injury resulted in a twenty-four percent permanent impairment of his left leg, (thirty percent impairment of the ankle).

Vari…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Fairbanks v. NesbettAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Wallace v. Coca-Cola Bottling Plants, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
  3. Goldstein v. SklarSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
  4. Ianni v. Grain Dealers Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Isaacson v. Husson CollegeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Raymond Johnson v. H.K. Webster, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  2. Wildes v. Pens Unlimited Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  3. S. H. Nevers Corp. v. Husky Hydraulics, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  4. Snow v. VillacciSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  5. Blais v. DavisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API