Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Collier

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided January 15, 1971No. 23,049Published

1ConcurrenceDarden, Judge

(concurring in the result) :

The availability of requested individual counsel is a decision for the convening authority. That he acted in this case is not satisfactorily shown by the notation in the Article 32, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 832, investigation that Collier agreed to other military counsel when he was told that requested counsel was on leave.

Collier’s renewal at trial of his request for counsel of his choice obviously would have been futile, as this counsel was then prosecuting the case for the Government. Under these circumstances, I would not invoke the doctrine…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. HartfieldUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API