Legal Opinion

Kasza v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1963No. Calendar 122, Docket 49,564PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.

Plaintiff sues for damages resulting from injuries sustained while she was a passenger on defendant’s bus. She was walking in the aisle, facing the back of the bus, going to a vacant seat, when the bus suddenly stopped, causing her to be thrown backwards and injured.

At the conclusion of plaintiff’s proofs defendant moved for a directed verdict of no cause for action on the ground that, as a matter of law, no proof of defendant’s negligence had been offered by plaintiff. The trial judge indicated that he thought the motion well founded but believed the purpose of the Empson act to be to permit…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mitcham v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Fish v. Grand Trunk Western RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Routhier v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  4. McDuffie v. RootMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Snyder v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Whitmore v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Beals v. WalkerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Perry v. Hazel Park Harness RacewayMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Vanden Bosch v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Garmo v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API