Legal Opinion

Buchman v. Canard

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 14, 2005No. Nos. 3D04-2102, 3D04-1474PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The Appellant, Robert Buchman (hereinafter “Buchman”), appeals from an Order granting the Appellee, Nancy Canard (hereinafter “Canard”), a one-third interest in Buchman’s homestead residence after the lower tribunal held, and this Court affirmed, that the property is a partnership asset, and is, therefore, not subject to the homestead exemption.

This case arises from a partnership between Buchman and Canard. In 1999, Mr. Buchman sold the partnership assets to a third party. After learning of the sale, Canard filed suit against Buchman, seeking an accounting, damages for breach of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bueno v. De KHAWLYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. Shephard v. OuelleteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  3. Buchman v. CanardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dandar v. Church of Scientology Flag Service Organization, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  2. David B. Ingraham v. The State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
  3. Jon Barri Bros. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API