Janicke v. Hilltop Farm Feed Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Loring, Chief Justice.
In an action brought to recover damages for breach of contract, the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiffs. Defendant appeals from the order denying its motion for a new trial.
In August 1946, defendant, Hilltop Farm Feed Company of Minneapolis, was the owner of an elevator and feed-mill plant at Douglas, Minnesota. The buildings were on land leased from a railroad company. There were trackage facilities. The plant had the benefit of transit privileges. This allowed it to stop a car in transit, remove the contents, put it in the elevator, at some later day grind…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. SpragueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Nelson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Patton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Beebe v. KleidonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Jurgensen v. Schirmer Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Hake v. Soo Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.