Legal Opinion

Janicke v. Hilltop Farm Feed Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 16, 1951No. 35,369PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Chief Justice.

In an action brought to recover damages for breach of contract, the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiffs. Defendant appeals from the order denying its motion for a new trial.

In August 1946, defendant, Hilltop Farm Feed Company of Minneapolis, was the owner of an elevator and feed-mill plant at Douglas, Minnesota. The buildings were on land leased from a railroad company. There were trackage facilities. The plant had the benefit of transit privileges. This allowed it to stop a car in transit, remove the contents, put it in the elevator, at some later day grind…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. SpragueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. Nelson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Patton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. Beebe v. KleidonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. Jurgensen v. Schirmer Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  5. Hake v. Soo Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API