Legal Opinion

In re McLaughlin

California Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1894No. 15409PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from an order of the City and County of San Francisco denying letters of administration to the public administrator and granting them to the guardian of the heir of decedent. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

Catherine McLaughlin died intestate, in the city and county of San Francisco, on October 20, 1892, leaving estate therein, and leaving as her sole heir at law a son thirty-seven years old, named James H. McLaughlin, who had been duly adjudged to be an incompetent person.

On March 17,1893, the respondent, Kate Kenney, the duly appointed, qualified, and acting guardian of said James H. McLaughlin, filed in the superior court of *430said city and county her petition asking that letters of administration on the estate of Catherine McLaughlin be issued to her. On March 20, 1893, A. C. Freese,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Estate of PingreeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Anderson's Committee v. Anderson's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1914
  2. Sprague v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Estate of HerriottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Estate of EdsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Clough v. BorelloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API