Legal Opinion

Mulhern v. Hayne

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 2, 1931No. 30711PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrunot, J.

On February 21, 1919, the plaintiff purchased from three of the defendants, viz., Frank B. Hayne, Hugh E. Vincent, and Mrs. Nannie C. Vincent, certain property, described as follows:

“The Northeast Quarter (N. E. %), and the Northwest Quarter (N. W. %.) of Southeast Quarter (S. E. %) Section Twenty-nine (29), Township Seventeen (17) North, Range Six (6) East, containing Two Hundred (200) acres, more or less, with improvements thereon and appurtenances thereunto belonging, situated in the Parish of Richland, State of Louisiana.”

In their deed to the plaintiff the vendors reserved to themselves…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nabors Oil & Gas Co. v. Louisiana Oil Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
  2. La Del Oil Properties, Inc. v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  3. Lewis v. Bodcaw Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1929

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Vincent v. BullockSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  2. Hightower v. MaritzkySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  3. Bremer v. North Central Texas Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  4. Brown v. Sugar Creek SyndicateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  5. Achee v. CaillouetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API