Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 19, 1997No. 96-707PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Carlos Hernandez appeals a judgment of conviction and sentence for armed robbery. Because the errors complained of were not objected to below and do not amount to fundamental error, either individually or cumulatively, the conviction is affirmed. See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1995); Davis v. State, 590 So.2d 496 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Jones v. State, 571 So.2d 1374 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); *973Deliford v. State, 505 So.2d 523 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

However, the state properly concedes error as to the defendant’s minimum mandatory sentence of 25 years. The applicable minimum mandatory sentence for a first degree…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Deliford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carlos Hernandez v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API