Legal Opinion

State v. Tremblay

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 7, 2003PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRudman, J.

[¶ 1] David Tremblay appeals from judgments of conviction of two counts of gross sexual assault (Class A) in violation of 17-A M.R.S.A. § 253(1)(B) (Supp.2002) 1 entered in the Superior Court (Androscoggin County, Gorman, J.) following a jury trial. Tremblay asserts, inter alia, that the trial court committed reversible error when it (1) refused, during deliberations, to disclose the contents of a note from the jury containing the jury’s numeric breakdown before issuing a supplemental instruction, and (2) prevented him from cross-examining the complainant, his former stepdaughter…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Waller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. People v. O'RamaNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. AlleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  3. State v. CottrellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  4. State of Maine v. Daudoit ButsitsiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
  5. State v. CottrellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API