Legal Opinion
State v. Muldowny
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 27, 2004No. 5D02-4035PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
871 So.2d 911 (2004)
STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
Timothy MULDOWNY and William E. Pitts, Appellees.
No. 5D02-4035.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
February 27, 2004.
Rehearing Denied May 4, 2004.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Belle B. Schumann, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Stuart I. Hyman of Stuart I. Hyman, P.A., Orlando, for Appellees.
PETERSON, J.
This appeal is before this court after a county court suppressed the results of intoxilyzer tests in two different cases in which Timothy Muldowny and William E. Pitts were…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Miller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- State v. PolakDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- State v. SlaneyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- State v. FloodDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- USAA Casualty Insurance Co. v. Prime Care Chiropractic Centers, P.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- State v. RandolDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. BerneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Moe v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- KUBASAK v. Department of Highway Safety and Motor VehiclesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.