Legal Opinion
Claim of Ilovar v. Consolidated Edison
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 27, 2006PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed December 22, 2004, which ruled that there was no causal relationship between claimant’s asbestosis and his loss of earnings.
Claimant was employed by Consolidated Edison for 23 years. During that time he was diagnosed with nonwork-related asthma and he suffered a nonwork-related heart attack. He was also exposed to asbestos. In September 1993, when he was 61 years old, claimant retired after accepting an early retirement incentive that granted him five additional years of service. In 1999, he was diagnosed with work-related…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Claim of Yamonaco v. Union Carbide Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Claim of Mazziotto v. Brookfield Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Claim of Calogero v. State Insurance FundAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Claim of Acunzo v. Newsday, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Claim of Fabrizio v. J. R. J. Concrete Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by4 opinions
- Claim of O'Rourke v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Parrelli v. Atlantic ConstructionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Matter of Garcia v. MCI Interiors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- Matter of Usewicz v. Nozbestos Constr. Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018