Legal Opinion

Duke v. Replogle Enterprises

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’BRIEN, Justice.

In this workers’ compensation action, the plaintiff appeals the trial court’s judgment dismissing his claim for benefits on the basis that the employer, doing business under the trade names of Replogle Enterprises, a/k/a Replogle Sawmill and styled as such in the plaintiffs original and timely complaint, does not have a legal existence and, therefore, is not capable of being sued.

The essential issue for review concerns whether the employee should be permitted to amend his complaint, after the statute of limitations has expired, to include the name of the sole…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Whitson, Admr. v. T.C. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Gogan v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Mosier v. LucasCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
  5. Mellon v. American Flour & Grain Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCracken v. Brentwood United Methodist ChurchCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  2. Linda & Wilburn Grantham v. Jackson-Madison Co General HospitalTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Legleu v. Clarksville Department of ElectricityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  4. Canada v. AceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API