Legal Opinion

Bartels v. Wade

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1936No. 29658PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoss, C. J.

By a judgment following a verdict, plaintiff was denied recovery on a note. Plaintiff appealed.

*837The note was for $500, dated October 31, 1931, due January 1, 1933, bearing interest after maturity. It was given by defendants to plaintiff on the same day they joined plaintiff in a written lease of plaintiff’s 240-acre farm for one year from March 1, 1932. The lease provided for a rental of $1,400, payable $300 in cash, $300 due March 1, 1932, $300 due October 1, 1932, and $500 due January 1, 1933, the last three payments evidenced by promissory notes. The evidence shows that the first three…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Security Savings Bank v. RhodesNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  2. S. Spiegal & Son v. AlpirnNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Seminole Bond & Mortgage Co. v. Investors Realty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Erwin v. KuhlmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ford v. Luria Steel & Trading Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
  2. Securities Acceptance Corp. v. BlakeNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Local Trademarks, Inc. v. GranthamDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API