Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Franklin

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 27, 1933No. 22741PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. The motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions, being upon the sole ground of an insufficient assignment of error as it appears only in the petition for certiorari, is manifestly without merit, and is therefore denied.

2. The first grant of a new trial by sustaining a certiorari, where the verdict was not demanded by the evidence, will not be disturbed, though based on a special ground of the motion, regardless of the merit of such ground. Atlantic & Birmingham Ry. Co. v. Cobb, 125 Ga. 121 (53 S. E. 591); Smith v. Hightower, 123 Ga. 110 (51 S. E. 28); Elliott v. McCalla, 123 Ga. 26 (50 S. E.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. National Union Fire Insurance v. OzburnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. Smith v. HightowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Atlantic & Birmingham Railway Co. v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. Elliott v. McCallaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Sunbeam Heating Co. v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tyler v. National Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  2. Hurt v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Peacock v. American Plant Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  4. Greenwood v. McGeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API