Commonwealth v. Stone
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Per Curiam,
Petitioner’s counsel in the Superior Court filed no brief and has filed an inadequate petition for allowance of appeal with this Court. This is not the “representation in the role of an advocate” which we require. See Ellis v. United States, 356 U.S. 674, 675, 78 S. Ct. 974, 2 L. Ed. 2d 1060 (1958); Commonwealth v. Stein, 436 Pa. 330, 260 A. 2d 467 (1969). Accordingly, the petition for allocatur is granted, the order of the Superior Court is vacated and the case remanded so that the Superior Court may consider the appeal upon the filing of a brief properly prepared by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Commonwealth v. SteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SullivanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. StoykoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. StoykoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. SullivanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. SullivanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.