Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Stone

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1970No. 3082-A, Miscellaneous DocketPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Petitioner’s counsel in the Superior Court filed no brief and has filed an inadequate petition for allowance of appeal with this Court. This is not the “representation in the role of an advocate” which we require. See Ellis v. United States, 356 U.S. 674, 675, 78 S. Ct. 974, 2 L. Ed. 2d 1060 (1958); Commonwealth v. Stein, 436 Pa. 330, 260 A. 2d 467 (1969). Accordingly, the petition for allocatur is granted, the order of the Superior Court is vacated and the case remanded so that the Superior Court may consider the appeal upon the filing of a brief properly prepared by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Commonwealth v. SteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SullivanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. StoykoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. StoykoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. SullivanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. SullivanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API