Legal Opinion

Smolyar v. Krongauz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 8, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In two related actions, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 12, 2002, as upon, in effect, granting his motion for leave to reargue, adhered to a prior determination in an order dated March 7, 2001, granting that branch of the motion of the defendant Josef Rottenstein which was for summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action insofar as asserted against him, on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Meyer v. GallardoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lesane v. TejadaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. I Mei Chou v. WelshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Friscia v. Mak Auto, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API