Legal Opinion

State v. . Holland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 11, 1927PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

The first law of nature is that of self-defense. The law of this State and elsewhere recognizes this primary impulse and inherent right. One being without fault, in defense of his person, in the exercise of ordinary firmness has a right to invoke this law and kill his assailant, if he has reasonable ground for believing or apprehending that he is about to suffer death or great or enormous bodily harm at his hands. The danger or necessity may be real or apparent. It is for the jury, and not the party setting up the plea, to determine, under all the facts and circumstances, the reasonableness…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. . BrittainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  2. State v. . DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  3. State v. . TurpinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  4. State v. Barrett.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  5. State v. . MatthewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. NormanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. State v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. State v. . EllerbeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  5. State v. WillardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API