Legal Opinion
State v. Rosenblit
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 10, 1967No. File No. CR 14-59241PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtJacobs, J.
The information in this case charged the defendant with abandonment of a refrigerator accessible to children in violation of § 23-9 (a) of the municipal code of the city of Hartford. See note, 86 A.L.R.2d 709, 710. The record before us discloses that the state failed to introduce in evidence the ordinance upon which this prosecution was founded.
“The question of the construction of the ordinance is one of law.” Norwalk v. Auction City, Inc., 186 Cal. App. 2d 287, 290. “ ‘Proof’ of the ordinance does not make it a fact; it only presents for judicial consideration a part of the law which may not…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Roden v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Appeal of PhillipsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Young v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Kiska v. SkrenskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Sisk v. Town of ShenandoahSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Pueblo v. MurphySupreme Court of Colorado · 1975