Legal Opinion

Community Discount & Mortgage Co. v. Joseph

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1927No. 20319PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

There is no conflict here upon the proposition that, where a purchaser of mortgaged lands assumes and agrees to pay the mortgage, such liability inures to the benefit of the mortgagee and may be enforced by him. This general rule is recognized in practically all jurisdictions. Although frequently so stated, it is erroneous to say that such contract is made for the benefit of the mortgagee; it is made wholly for the benefit of the parties to it, as so clearly stated by Spear, J., in the opinion in Denison University v. Manning, 65 Ohio St., 138, 61 N. E., 706. The mortgagee may elect to take…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Willard v. WorshamSupreme Court of Virginia · 1882

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hunter v. Bps Guard Services, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Mullin v. Claremont Realty Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Bank of Leipsic Co. v. KreinbrinkOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. Green v. ShepherdOhio Court of Appeals · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API