Commonwealth v. Ward
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Per curiam
Appellant was found guilty by a jury of receiving stolen goods1 specifically four credit cards. He alleges the following errors on appeal:(1) The credit cards, and testimony pertaining thereto, were improperly admitted into evidence because they were obtained as a direct result of an unlawful confession;(2) Prejudicial references to appellant’s prior criminal record were admitted into evidence; and(3) The evidence was not sufficient to convict appellant.
Defendant was arrested on an arrest warrant for another charge in a bar where he had been drinking for several hours. He was not wearing a…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SimalaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Commonwealth v. HendersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. OwensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Commonwealth v. SimmonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. DeCampliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JerrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. JerrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983