Legal Opinion

Rozelle v. Barnard

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1963No. 7198PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAVEZ, Justice.

Suit was filed by David Rozelle and Rex-ford A. Rozelle, plaintiffs-appellees, against Joe Barnard, d/b/a United Motor Exchange, and Public Finance Corporation, defendants-appellants, to set aside a conditional sales contract, for a declaratory judgment, and for damages. Answer was filed by Public Finance Corporation. Barnard did not answer. Thereafter, the trial court held a pretrial conference and, after hearing arguments of counsel and examining the pleadings and exhibits, entered a judgment canceling the conditional sales contract between David Rozelle and Public Finance…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. DeselmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Buffington v. Continental Casualty CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Sooner Pipe & Supply Corp. v. DoerrieNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Mitchell v. Intermountain Casualty CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Johnsen v. FryarNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. State v. CarilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. JacquezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. State v. LuceroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API