Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 29, 2004Published

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jacobson, J.), dated April 25, 2003, which denied her motion for a trial preference pursuant to CPLR 3403 (a) (3).

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion, with costs, and the motion is granted.

The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiff’s motion for a trial preference on the ground of her indigency (see CPLR 3403 [a] [3]; Hoyt v Kazel, 265 AD2d 527, 528 [1999]; Cenname v Lindholm, 69 AD2d 848,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cenname v. LindholmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. Hoyt v. KazelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API