Legal Opinion

Mansfield Lumber Co. v. Gravette

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 30, 1928PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). It is earnestly insisted by counsel for appellant that Mrs. A. L. Beason had an equitable interest in the lots -described in the complaint, and that it had a lien for materials furnished • by it, under the provisions of § 6906 et seq. of Crawford & Mo-ses’ Digest. We cannot agree with counsel in this contention. It is true that M'iss Gravette executed a deed to Mrs. Beason to the lots in question, but the deed was placed in escrow with the First National Bank of Gravette, to be turned over to the -grantee in the deed when the payments of purchase money…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cook v. CaveSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  2. Ford v. MoodySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  3. Malley v. QuinnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. Ober, Attwater & Co. v. PendletonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1875
  5. Bondurant v. EnisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Diversified Mortgage Investors v. Lloyd D. Blaylock General Contractor, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Sebastian Building & Loan Ass'n v. MintenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  3. Ferguson v. the C. H. Triplett CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  4. National Cash Register Co. v. HoltSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  5. Ark. Foundry Co. v. FarrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API