United States v. Naugle
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge:
When a sentencing judge has declined to depart below the Guidelines range, the judge either believed he or she did not have the power to depart, or chose not to exercise that power. In a number of recent cases, the court of appeals has remanded when it was not sufficiently clear from the record that the sentencing judge was aware of the power to depart. For reasons explained in this memorandum, an either-or formulation conflicts with a number of functions of the sentencing judge. Sometimes this concern for the feelings of the defendant and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Coy v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Stein v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Braschi v. Stahl Associates Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. ShonubiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- United States v. RoseDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- United States v. DeRiggiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- United States v. Hollman CheungDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- United States v. Lopez-AguilarDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.