Legal Opinion

Ruck v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1913PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of tbe circuit court for Milwaukee county: F. 0. Esohweilee, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtTimlin, J.

Tbe defendant is a railroad corporation of Wisconsin, and the plaintiff was in its employment as a-*160'boiler maker at its shops at Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Obedient to instructions from defendant, the plaintiff went to Galewood, Illinois, for the purpose of assisting in repairing a boiler and with intention to return to his work at Milwaukee when the Galewood task was completed. This boiler had been attached- to and used in operating a derrick or hoist fastened on a flat car, and this car so equipped was used as-oné car of a wrecking train. This car was generally housed in one of the stalls of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. The Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Zikos v. Oregon R. & Navigation Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Washington · 1910
  5. Central R. of New Jersey v. ColasurdoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Gray v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Morris v. SampsellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Zavitovsky v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API