Legal Opinion

State v. Rendahl

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 25, 1982No. 81-112C, CA A21807; No. 81-115C, CA A21808PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for robbery and kidnapping. He contends the trial court erred in (1) applying the enhanced penalty provisions of ORS 161.610,1 (2) denying his motion for judgment of acquittal on five kidnapping charges and (3) in failing to merge his convictions. We affirm.

Defendant and one Owens entered a lounge with the objective of committing robbery. At trial, two witnesses testified that they had observed a gun in defendant’s possession. Other witnesses testified that only Owens had been armed. Defendant did not have a gun when he was arrested, and he denied that he had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. KrummacherOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State v. GarciaOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. LinthwaiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. State v. DinkelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pueblo v. Echevarría RodríguezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1991
  2. State v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API