Legal Opinion

Garza v. Hansen

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided July 14, 2020No. 8:19-cv-00392Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA ROBERT GARZA, Petitioner, 8:19CV392 vs. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BRAD HANSEN, Respondent. This matter is before me on initial review of Petitioner Robert Garza’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Filing 1.) I conduct this review pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts.1 For purposes of this initial review, I will grant Garza’s Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Petition (filing 8) and will consider the supplemental allegations as part of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Burton v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Joseph Coady v. Donald T. Vaughn the District Attorney of the County of Montgomery the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  4. Edmond v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Alonzo Cook v. New York State Division of Parole, and New York State Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API