Legal Opinion

Woodmere v. Workman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 13, 2022No. 110449PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Woodmere v. Workman,

2022-Ohio-71.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA VILLAGE OF WOODMERE, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 110449 v. : JOSEPH M. WORKMAN, : Defendant-Appellant. : JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION JUDGMENT: REVERSED AND VACATED RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: January 13, 2022 Criminal Appeal from the Bedford Municipal Court Case No. 19 CRB 02290 Appearances: Lou D. Stolarsky, City of Woodmere Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Bolek, Besser, Glesius, L.L.C., Cathleen M. Bolek, and Matthew D. Besser, for appellant. SEAN C. GALLAGHER, A.J.: Joseph…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Texas v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. KingOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
  2. State v. StarrOhio Court of Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API