Legal Opinion

James Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Sinensky

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1954Published

1Opinion of the CourtMaximilian Moss, J.

Plaintiff seeks a temporary injunction restraining defendants from picketing plaintiff’s promises. Plaintiff contends that there is no labor dispute between the parties within the meaning of section 876-a of the Civil Practice Act, also that the picketing is being conducted by defendants in a violent and unlawful manner. Defendant union categorically denies that it has been guilty of any unlawful activities in connection with its picketing and asserts that it is engaged in organizational activities directed towards improving and bettering the working conditions of plaintiff’s employees.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Palermo v. MottoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API