Matter of Antcliff
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
The respondent, an attorney admitted to the Bar of this state in 1958, has been criminally convicted of stealing funds belonging to his clients. For that misconduct, we conclude that he should be disbarred.
On October 17, 1994, the Disciplinary Commission filed a Verified Complaint for Disciplinary Action against the respondent, alleging multiple violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law arising from the respondent’s criminal convictions. This Court suspended him penden-te lite on January 4, 1995. Pursuant to Ind.Admission and Discipline Rule…
3Cited by1 opinion
- In the Matter of: Timothy S. DurhamIndiana Supreme Court · 2016