Legal Opinion

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Augner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 18, 1941PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals from an order vacating, upon terms, a judgment entered on inquest. The application to open the default sought the favor of the court and, therefore, irrespective of whether under the present circumstances the right of plaintiff to use, without defendant’s consent, testimony of the witness who had died since the taking of the inquest is sanctioned by law (See Bradley v. Mirick, 91 N. Y. 293), we feel that the court should have required the defendant to stipulate that such testimony might be used as a condition to opening the default.

The order should be modified by providing…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bradley v. . MirickNew York Court of Appeals · 1883

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Green v. BrunettiCity of New York Municipal Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API