Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Miraglia v. H & L Holding Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 17, 2009Published

1ConcurrenceMcGuire, J.

Lane & Sons Construction Corp. seeks leave to reargue its appeal. Alternatively, it seeks leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals. While I agree with the majority that reargument should be granted and leave to appeal should be denied, a brief discussion of both motions is warranted.

Flaintiff was injured while working on a construction project on property owned by defendant H & L Holding Corp. (306 AD2d 58 [2003]). Flaintiff commenced a personal injury action against H & L, which subsequently impleaded Lane, plaintiffs employer. H & L was granted summary judgment on its claim for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miraglia v. H & L Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Miraglia v. H&L Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Miraglia v. H&L Holding Corp.New York Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Miraglia v. H & L Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API