Legal Opinion

Fornix Holdings LLC v. Unknown Party

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided April 29, 2025No. 2:23-cv-01200Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Fornix Holdings LLC, et al., No. CV-23-01200-PHX-MTL 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 Unknown Party, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pursuant to Rule 55(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs Fornix 16 Holdings LLC and CP Productions, Incorporated (“Plaintiffs”) move for default judgment 17 against Defendants John Doe #1 d/b/a/ pornez.net; John Doe #2 d/b/a/ cumgloryhole.com; 18 and John Doe #3 d/b/a/ hqcollect.net (“Defendants”). (Doc. 33.) Defendants have not 19 responded to the motion for…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API