Munn v. Munn
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Judge.
In considering this case we reiterate the following basic principles. Under Georgia law, “discovery may . . . be had from defendants in fi. fa. as to the property from which executions may be satisfied in the same manner as if said action was pending in the court to which such executions are returnable.” Code Ann. § 38-1201 (Ga. L. 1955, p. 578; Ga. L. 1959, pp. 425, 443). In such case information as to the defendant in fi. fa.’s ownership of property, engagement in business, holdings of stock, employment, salary, other income, bank accounts, transfers- of property and tax…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Holland v. Sanfax CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Reynolds v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Moore v. Atlanta Transit System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Payer, Hewitt & Co. v. Bellanca Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1960
- Schotthofer v. Hagstrom Construction Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mullis v. BoneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Bullard v. EwingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Central Mutual Insurance v. WoffordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Fleming v. BuseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980