Williams v. KCMO Broadcasting Division— Meredith Corp.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Judge.
This is an action for invasion of privacy growing out of a television news broadcast. The trial court sustained defendant’s motion for summary judgment and the appellant has duly appealed to this court. We shall refer to the parties as they appeared below.
There are no controverted issues of fact in this case. On January 16, 1969, the plaintiff, a high school senior without any prior arrest record, came downtown in Kansas City, Missouri, for the purpose of answering an ad for a job. He encountered two fellow students and since it was too early to apply for the job, they agreed to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Coverstone v. DaviesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Barber v. Time, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
- Gill v. Hearst Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1953
- Metter v. Los Angeles ExaminerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Munden v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Martin McNally v. The Pulitzer Publishing Company and Ted GestCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Newspapers, Inc. v. BreierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Hyde v. City of ColumbiaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Sullivan v. Pulitzer Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- Corcoran v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.