Legal Opinion

Conary v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 21, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

The plaintiff is the administratrix of the estate of Arthur L. Conary. The action is in tort to recover damages for his conscious suffering and death resulting from an accident which occurred November 15, 1920, in the town of Reading, where Lowell Street crosses the defendant’s tracks by an overhead bridge. The intestate was operating a Ford automobile. As he was travelling on the incline leading to the bridge, one of the front wheels went into a depression in the surface of the way. The automobile turned and went through a wooden fence on to the railroad location. The intestate was injured…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brooks v. Fitchburg & Leominster Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Feeley v. City of MelroseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  3. Charles v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  4. Daley v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  5. Dickie v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Caissie v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Hurlburt v. Town of Great BarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API