Legal Opinion

Gaines & Sea v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 23, 1915PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Anderson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Hannah

Affirming in part and reversing in part.

Graines & Sea instituted this action in the Anderson Circuit Court against the R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, to recover damages for the alleged breach of a contract claimed to have been made with them by T. W. Blackwell, acting for the defendant tobacco company, whereby the latter agreed to purchase from the plaintiffs, (1) a certain lot of leaf tobacco owned by the plaintiffs, and graded and bulked in the warehouse at Lawrenceburg; together with (2) another certain lot of tobacco which the plaintiffs had that day…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Newton v. Bayless Fruit Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  2. Bell v. HatfieldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
  3. Hagins v. CombsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
  4. Marshall v. PilesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1867

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Motor Investment Co. v. City of HamlinTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Corthell v. Summit Thread Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933
  3. Gaines & Sea v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  4. Dwight Bros. Paper Co. v. GinzburgAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925
  5. General Supply Inc. v. BosselmanMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API