Legal Opinion
In Re Avandia Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided April 8, 2008No. MDL 1871PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TRANSFER ORDER
D. LOWELL JENSEN, Acting Chairman.
Before the entire Panel * : Plaintiffs in nine actions listed on Schedule A and pending in the Central District of California (one action) and the Northern District of California (eight actions), respectively, have moved, pursuant to Rule 7.4, R.P.J.P.M.L., 199 F.R.D. 425, 435-36 (2001), to vacate our orders conditionally transferring the actions to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for inclusion in MDL No. 1871. Responding defendant SmithKlineBeecham Corp. d/b/a/ GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) opposes the motions.
After considering all argument of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Prudential Ins. Co. of America Sales Pract.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2001
- In Re Smith Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1976
- In Re Avandia Marketing, Sales PracticesUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2007
3Cited by4 opinions
- Breon v. Georgia Bank & Trust Co.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2008
- In Re: Merscorp Inc.(respa) LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2008
- In Re Bp SecuritiesUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010
- In re BP Securities, Derivative & Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010